⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6a9d96d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/angular-db@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/db@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/db-browser-wa-sqlite-persisted-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/db-ivm@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/db-react-native-sqlite-persisted-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/db-sqlite-persisted-collection-core@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/electric-db-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/offline-transactions@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/powersync-db-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/query-db-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/react-db@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/rxdb-db-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/solid-db@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/svelte-db@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/trailbase-db-collection@1329

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/TanStack/db/@tanstack/vue-db@1329

commit: 6a9d96d

Size Change: 0 B

Total Size: 110 kB

_{compressed-size-action::db-package-size}

Size Change: 0 B

Total Size: 4.23 kB

_{compressed-size-action::react-db-package-size}

The fetchWithRetry keeps retrying with exponential backoff, causing an infinite "Loading todos"

The infinite retry loop here might be related to #1065

GPT5.4 review:

Findings

• High: examples/react/offline-transactions does not production-build on this branch. Running pnpm build in that example fails with Vite/Rollup resolving @tanstack/db-sqlite-persisted-collection-core. The new config aliases @tanstack/db-browser-wa-sqlite-persisted-collection straight to its source entry, but that entry immediately re-exports persistedCollectionOptions from the core workspace package, and this example never aliases or depends on that package. So the new wa-sqlite route currently only works in a partial local-dev setup and is not merge-ready as a shippable example.

resolve: {
  alias: {
    // Resolve to source so Vite can process the ?worker import natively
    '@tanstack/db-browser-wa-sqlite-persisted-collection': path.resolve(
      __dirname,
      `../../../packages/db-browser-wa-sqlite-persisted-collection/src/index.ts`,
    ),
  },
},

export { createBrowserWASQLitePersistence } from './browser-persistence'
export { openBrowserWASQLiteOPFSDatabase } from './opfs-database'
export { BrowserCollectionCoordinator } from './browser-coordinator'
export type { BrowserCollectionCoordinatorOptions } from './browser-coordinator'
export { persistedCollectionOptions } from '@tanstack/db-sqlite-persisted-collection-core'

Assumptions

The PR body for #1329 already has “Replace the workspace dependencies...” unchecked, so this may be known. I’m still calling it out because it is a real blocker today, not just cleanup.

Residual Risk

I didn’t count the existing SPA/API example breakage against this PR since the author already called that out and it predates these changes. I also didn’t do browser smoke testing after finding the build blocker.

@kevin-dp maybe for a different PR, but the current (including in main) state of offline-transactions still has lots of copy-pasted stuff in the docs and names (eg, "name": "tanstack-start-example-basic" in package.json) that makes getting things running harder than it could be. Were you going to take care of that or would you like a separate docs PR?

@kevin-dp maybe for a different PR, but the current (including in main) state of offline-transactions still has lots of copy-pasted stuff in the docs and names (eg, "name": "tanstack-start-example-basic" in package.json) that makes getting things running harder than it could be. Were you going to take care of that or would you like a separate docs PR?

Hi @AntonOfTheWoods, i'd prefer fixing that in a separate PR and keep this one focused.

Ok. I tried running it and was a little surprised to see it doesn't even build. The code depends on methods that haven't existed for months in dependencies...

@samwillis I addressed your review in 515fc6c. Vite now builds the app. Typescript is emitting some errors though but this predates this PR and is also the case in main. Something to fix in a follow up PR.